Search articles

Galina S. Kharlamova – Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Associate professor, Professor, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation.

The article aims to support the National Project "Education", the formation of students` basic (universal) skills that accompany the processes of personal formation of a person. It is noted that the processes of self-identification of person are connected with manifestation of all his abilities - not only mind, feelings, experiences, but also will, belief. A historical and philosophical overview of different approaches to the understanding of faith is presented. It shows the dependence of solutions to the problem of faith on the paradigm of a particular era. The complex character of modern domestic philosophers` research, studying both epistemology and substantive aspects of faith, is emphasized. The question of the possibility of understanding faith as an ontologically rooted property of person, which conditions his actions, is discussed. The methodology of philosophical anthropology is used, pointing out the openness of person to the world, his ability to interpret faith as an ideological universal. Ideas Reception of A.S. Chomiakova allowed us to characterize faith as a state that requires its obligatory manifestation. It is shown that faith, as a way of human activity, is the basis for the formation of a unique personality with a value attitude to the world, characterizes the moral aspect of human existence. It is concluded that faith, knowledge and action are inseparable.

Evgeny E. Nesmeyanov – Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Professor, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation.
Galina S. Kharlamova – Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philosophy, Associate professor, Professor, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation.
The article substantiates the increased threat of the loss of traditional spiritual and moral guidelines, the introduction of ideals and values isolated from historical traditions into the minds of Russian people. The theory justifying such a type of person as a posthuman is critically evaluated. The prerequisites for the appearance of a posthuman, one of the signs of which is clip thinking, are considered. The closeness of clip and mythological thinking is emphasized. It is noted that clip thinking creates prerequisites for the appearance of fakes. Methodological approaches of countering fake information, applicable in pedagogical practice, are proposed.